vacly
BlogTime management
Time management

How to approve clock-ins and time incidents without a Friday spreadsheet

One queue for clock-ins, leave and absences: approve or reject, in bulk or one by one, with a comment and a history. The employee is told by push or in-app notice.

Updated: 18 August 20269 min read

1 queue

Clock-ins, leave and absences

Bulk

Approve when the month is clean

Push / in-app

Employee notice of the decision

Art. 34.9 ET

The daily record already applies

The short answer

Approving clock-ins and time incidents means reviewing missed marks, doubtful entries, leave and absences in one queue, accepting or rejecting them with a trail — not rewriting the month in a spreadsheet on Friday. As of 18 August 2026 the daily record is already required (article 34.9 of the Workers’ Statute, Royal Decree-Law 8/2019): Labour Inspection looks at whether the entry is reliable, not whether you have a tidy Excel at the last minute.

A chat where a missed clock-in is “fixed” does not show who decided. A queue with a comment, a history and a notice to the employee does. The digital time-record royal decree is not in the official gazette; nobody certifies your software. What you can show is the record and the trail of what was approved.

This article is informational for Spanish SMEs and payroll firms. It is not legal advice.

What does it mean to approve a clock-in or an incident?

Approval is not “making the sheet add up”. It is deciding, with a name and a date, whether an entry or a request belongs in the month or is rejected. A missed clock-in, a holiday and a sick note are different facts, but the manager should not chase them in three places.

  • An approved clock-in is a start and end entry the manager accepts as the real working day.
  • An incident, in practice, is whatever does not stand on its own: a missed mark, a doubtful stamp, a request that needs a yes or no.
  • Approve or reject leaves a trail of who decided. Editing a cell on Friday does not.
  • Article 34.9 requires a daily record, start and end times, four years’ retention and access for the employee, employee representatives (if any) and Labour Inspection. It does not mandate a medium. It does require the record to be real and retrievable.
  • Paper and Excel are still formally valid as of 18 August 2026 if they are reliable. A shared spreadsheet rewritten with no history is not.

Why does a Friday spreadsheet fail an inspection?

The usual SME problem is not having nothing. It is rebuilding the month the day before it goes to the payroll firm, or the day Inspection calls. That is not a record. It is a version.

  • Inspection already works under the 2019 rule. It does not wait for the digital royal decree, which has not been published at this date.
  • Unrecorded overtime, identical clock-ins every day, or a missed mark “fixed” in a chat raise more questions than an open incident closed with a trail.
  • Current record fines sit in the LISOS minor and serious bands, roughly €70 to €7,500 depending on the case. The much higher draft figures are not law today.
  • In payroll firms the pattern is a different spreadsheet per client, or a paper file that “is at the office” and cannot be produced on the day.
  • Closing the month in bulk makes sense when the month is clean. It does not if bulk means filling gaps by eye.

What goes through the same queue: clock-ins, leave and absences?

If the missed clock-in goes to WhatsApp, the holiday to email and the sick note as a PDF to the advisor, Friday has no picture of the month. One inbox for managers and HR holds what is pending.

Clock-ins

Doubtful marks or missed in/out stamps. They are approved or rejected; the gap is not patched on a parallel sheet.

Leave

Day-off requests enter the same queue. The manager sees them with the other incidents, not on a loose calendar.

Absences

Sick leave and permits waiting for a yes or no. The type and the attachment live in Absences; the decision lives here.

How do you approve a missed clock-in without covering it up?

A month with no incidents is often a dressed-up month, not a perfect one. A single well-handled miss is easier to explain than a rewritten cell.

  • Decide in advance who corrects a miss, by when, and with what comment. Tell the team the rule; do not invent it on Friday.
  • Approve or reject one by one when there is doubt, or in bulk when the month is clean and only confirmations remain.
  • The comment sits with the decision. It helps you, payroll and the agency when they ask why that day does not match the rota.
  • The employee gets a push or in-app notice. They do not depend on a loose message that later disappears.
  • WhatsApp can be the clock-in channel; it is not the incident archive. The entry and the approval live in the system.

What stays in the history, and who is told?

The value of approval is not the “accept” click. It is being able to show, months later, who approved or rejected and what the person was told.

  • History per employee: what was asked, what was decided and who did it.
  • An internal comment with the decision, not a parallel thread that never travels with the file.
  • A push or in-app notice to the employee after each decision.
  • The old notifications URL redirects to this queue. It is not another product: it is this inbox.
  • That is not a certification badge. There is no official ITSS or AEAT list of approved time-record software.

FAQ

Do we have to approve every clock-in by hand?

Not necessarily one by one. When the month is clean you can approve in bulk. If there is a miss or a doubt, you open the item, comment and decide. The trail is what separates this from a rewritten spreadsheet.

Can we “fix” a missed clock-in by editing Excel?

You can change a cell. You usually cannot show who changed it or when. Inspection looks at reliability. A validated miss with a history can be explained; a new Friday cell, less so.

Is a WhatsApp group enough to approve incidents?

Not as an archive. The chat can be deleted and is not kept for four years. WhatsApp can be the clock-in channel if the entry lands in the system. The approval of the miss lives in the queue, not in the group.

Is Vacly Time certified / homologated?

No. There is no official certification of working-time software. Anyone selling that badge is using a word that does not map to a public register today. What is required is a daily, retrievable, exportable record, with a trail of what was approved.

Does the employee hear about the decision?

Yes. After an approve or reject they get a push or in-app notice. It does not depend on someone remembering to write to them.

Is the notifications screen a different tool?

No. The old notifications URL redirects to Approvals. It is the same queue for clock-ins, leave and absences.

How Vacly Time handles this

Vacly Time puts approval in Validaciones: one queue for clock-ins, leave and absences, with bulk or one-by-one approval, a comment, a history and a push or in-app notice to the employee. The old notifications URL redirects here. The product page is https://www.vacly.es/producto/tiempo/validaciones. From €8.89 per employee per month, VAT included. 15-day trial. It is not “certified” software: that badge does not exist. It is the inbox that stops you closing the month in a Friday spreadsheet.

Volver a Time management